What are agentic workflows?

Discover what makes a workflow agentic, how it works, and how it's different from traditional flows.

Traditional workflows were built for static processes: step-by-step sequences, repetitive tasks, and never-changing rules. This worked fine when businesses were predictable.

But today? Things move too fast. 

Customer expectations shift, supply chains wobble, and exceptions are the rule. Businesses can’t just automate—they need systems that think, adjust, and respond in real time.

That’s where agentic workflows come in.

Unlike conventional workflows, agentic workflows are designed to operate with autonomy, adaptability, and contextual awareness. They don’t just execute steps—they reason through them. They learn, course-correct, and coordinate across systems like a smart operations team would.

Agentic workflows are not just faster — they’re smarter.

Let’s dive deeper.

What is an agentic workflow? 

At the core of agentic workflows are AI agents

Agentic workflows are automated workflows empowered by autonomous AI agents that bring adaptability, planning, and decision-making capabilities to the process.

They autonomously run through sequences of tasks within a bigger process. These agents can make their own decisions and can adjust what they're doing dynamically on the fly. They can tackle problems that were maybe too complex for just one AI system before.

Let’s look at an example. Say you're processing a refund request. A traditional workflow follows a static script: verify order, check eligibility, and issue a refund. If any edge case arises — like a missing invoice or a flagged account — the process stops, awaiting human intervention.

An agentic workflow, on the other hand, behaves more like a trained teammate.

An AI agent can:

  • Investigate the missing invoice across connected systems
  • Ask a fellow agent to flag finance for escalation
  • Pull in contextual policies
  • Suggest next steps — or take them, depending on guardrails

These agents don’t just execute—they reason. They use language models, planning capabilities, access to APIs and data sources, and sometimes even human collaboration to get the job done.

What makes a workflow agentic?

A workflow becomes agentic when it shifts from being static and rule-based to being dynamic, goal-directed, and context-aware, with the integration of autonomous agents. It brings the best of both worlds—reliability of structured workflows and the intelligent, flexible capabilities of LLMs.

agentic workflows

In simple terms, 

Autonomous AI agents + Automated workflows = Agentic workflows. 
Components Description
Automated Workflows Rule-based, predefined sequences of tasks, often static and linear.
AI agents Systems capable of reasoning, decision-making, and tool use.
Agentic Workflows Workflows are dynamically executed by AI agents with autonomy to plan, act, and adapt.

How do the agentic workflows compare to the traditional workflows as we know them?

Agentic architectures

Without the right architecture, agents can easily break, loop endlessly, or turn into black boxes no one trusts. On that note, we recommend you take a look at various agentic architectures with which you can build your agentic workflows. 👇

agentic workflows
Agentic architectures: How to build and use AI agents

Agentic RAG

Within the architecture you set up, agents operate in a tiered structure, each searching specialized knowledge repositories or databases, often using agentic rag where autonomous agents dynamically retrieve and integrate information into AI-generated responses. These intelligent AI agents not only retrieve information but also execute tasks based on complex workflows.

With that, let's now compare and contrast ai agentic workflows with traditional workflows.

AI agentic workflows vs. traditional workflows 

Traditional workflows are predictable. They usually stop as soon as something unexpected happens. This requires humans to step in. An example is - RPA (Robotic Process Automation). It’s great for repetitive processes, and things that are based on fixed rules. But if something unexpected happens, RPA often just stops. It falters.

Agentic workflows, on the other hand, bring in this agility. Real decision-making within the automation. The agents have agency—the power to make independent judgments and adapt based on what's actually happening right then.

Traditional workflows follow instructions. Agentic workflows figure things out.

It's like giving the automation more autonomy and intelligence. But the critical difference here is the adaptability. 

Point of Difference Agentic Workflows Traditional Workflows
Structure Dynamic, goal-driven plans Predefined, static sequences
Adaptability High; agents can reason and react Low; rigid decisions
Autonomy High None
Human involvement Minimal Frequent, especially with edge cases
Contextual awareness High; agents pull context from APIs, databases, and documents Limited; data lives in silos
Scalability Designed for scale with modular agents Bottlenecks as complexity grows

With differences out of the way, the next obvious question is what constitutes these agentic workflows? What makes them so dynamic and adaptive?

Components of agentic ai workflows

There are several key building blocks responsible for the workflows. 

AI agents (Reasoning)

AI agents are what transform a traditional workflow into an agentic workflow. They’re the cognitive engine where AI models plan, evaluate, and decide the next actions. They divide complex tasks into smaller subtasks and select appropriate tools or strategies to accomplish them. The reasoning module enables iterative decision-making and problem-solving. 

LLMs

AI agents run on LLMs. These serve as the "brain" of the agent, providing the ability to understand natural language, reason, generate text, and often perform basic code generation. They are crucial for planning, decision-making, and interacting with tools.

Tools

What makes these AI agents really powerful is that they can use tools. This extends their capabilities beyond text generation and allows them to perform real-world actions like searching the web, writing code, sending emails, or interacting with databases.

Memory

Agents need to retain and access information from past interactions and experiences. This can include:

  • Short-term memory (Context Window): The immediate context of the current interaction.
  • Long-term memory (Vector Databases, Knowledge Graphs): Persistent storage for recalling past events, learned information, and knowledge relevant to the agent's tasks.

Advanced prompt engineering

Not the basic prompts, but complex techniques like planning, chain of thought, and self-reflection. Think of it like this: basic prompting is asking a student one question. These advanced techniques are like giving them a whole research project. They need to plan, show their work, reflect on it, and make it better.

Similarly, AI improves its own output. It iterates. It reviews its own drafts, essentially.

AI orchestration

In complex situations involving autonomous agents, some form of workflow or AI orchestration is often necessary. This can involve an orchestrator agent or a coordination that naturally arises from the interactions between individual agents.

Imagine like an orchestra. Each AI agent is a different instrument with a specific part. And something directs them. 

Integrations

To perform real-world actions, agents frequently need to interact with other systems and applications. This could involve triggering workflows in other platforms, updating records in databases, sending notifications, or interacting with IoT devices. Seamless integrations enable these interactions. 

Now that the key components are clear, it would be interesting to see how these work together. 

How do agentic workflows work?

Imagine a large retailer receives an online order for a high-demand item that’s currently out of stock. In a traditional rule-based system, the process is static — the system flags it as ‘out of stock’, sends a generic message to the customer, and queues the order until inventory is restocked. No adaptability, no proactive communication, and no alternatives offered.

With an agentic workflow, the system treats the situation as a dynamic, multi-agent problem to be solved in real time:

1. Understanding the issue

A customer places an order for a product that’s unavailable. A review agent is triggered. It checks real-time inventory across warehouses, recent replenishment schedules, and vendor delivery timelines. It confirms the product is indeed unavailable.

Then, it proactively notifies the customer with a tailored message:

"Your item is currently unavailable. Would you like to explore some alternatives?"

2. Executing next steps

If the customer opts to explore alternatives, a replacement agent is activated. This agent scans the product catalog using vector similarity or rules (e.g., same category, price range, specs) to find near-identical items in stock.

It prepares a shortlist and sends it to the customer with estimated delivery times. Meanwhile, the review agent logs all updates across internal systems — order management, CRM, and warehouse dashboards — so all teams stay aligned.

3. Adaptive tool use

If the customer selects a replacement, the fulfillment agent takes over. It coordinates with the warehouse to prioritize packing and labeling. It also pulls delivery estimates from carrier APIs and books the shipment.

If the customer prefers to wait, the agent sets a monitoring trigger to auto-update the customer when stock is replenished.

4. Iterating based on outcomes

If the customer doesn’t respond or declines all alternatives, the workflow adapts again. The replacement agent expands the search to include compatible bundles, promotions, or waitlist incentives.

It might even involve a pricing agent to offer a temporary discount or upgrade option.

5. Finalizing and learning

Once the order is fulfilled — either with a replacement or restocked item — the entire interaction is logged. The agents analyze what worked (e.g., which suggestions were accepted), feeding that data into future recommendations.

This is how a responsive agentic system works. Responsive and autonomous coordination transforms operational challenges into opportunities for customer delight. Over time, the ai-driven agentic system gets smarter — reducing customer wait times, optimizing fulfillment, and minimizing support escalations.

AI agents can use different ways to achieve the goal they set out for. And, this gives rise to different patterns in the workflow. 

Patterns in agentic workflows

Agentic workflow patterns are the repeatable and reusable structures that guide how autonomous AI agents perform tasks and achieve goals. Unlike traditional, static workflows with predefined steps, agentic workflows are dynamic and allow AI agents to make decisions, adapt to new information, and act independently. 

These patterns leverage the core capabilities of AI agents, including reasoning, planning, tool usage, and memory.

Here's a breakdown of common agentic workflow patterns:

Planning pattern

AI breaks down big tasks into smaller, easier steps (task decomposition). This improves AI reasoning and reduces errors. It's useful when the solution isn't clear and flexibility is key, like debugging software. 

The AI can try different approaches and adjust if something doesn't work. While powerful for complex problems needing deep thinking, planning can make results less predictable compared to standard workflows. So, it's best for tasks that really need problem-solving and multiple steps of reasoning.

Tool use pattern

Generative LLMs are limited by their training data and can't access real-time information, sometimes leading to inaccurate responses. RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) improves this by providing relevant external data. 

Tool use in agentic workflows goes further, enabling LLMs to interact with the real world through tools like APIs and web browsers to perform specific tasks and achieve goals.

Reflection pattern

Reflection in agentic workflows is like an AI giving itself feedback to improve. It checks its own work, fixes mistakes, and learns for the future. This helps AI handle complex tasks and get better over time without needing constant human help.

Multi-agent pattern

Multiple AI agents with different roles, specializations, or perspectives collaborate to solve a complex problem. These multi-agent systems communicate, share information, and coordinate their actions to achieve a common goal.

Other notable patterns:

  • Prompt Chaining: The output of one language model becomes the input for the next, creating a sequence of processing steps. While it can be part of an agentic workflow, it can also exist in more structured workflows.
  • Routing or Handoff: An agent analyzes input and directs it to the most appropriate specialized agent or process based on its content or intent.

Agentic automation (or) agentic workflows in the enterprise

Implementing agentic workflows isn't just about gaining efficiency; it's about reimagining entire business processes—how they flow, how to get things done, etc. 

It’s about transforming traditional workflows into responsive, versatile, and self-evolving business processes.
Benefit Impact on your enterprise
Cost efficiency Scale operations & growth without proportional cost increases
Agility & Flexibility Rapid response to disruptions and changing conditions
Improved operations Faster task completion, 24/7 availability, reduced manual effort
Security & governance Compliance and risk mitigation in AI-driven processes
Continuous improvement Self-optimizing workflows that evolve with business needs
Enhanced user experience Better customer service and employee satisfaction
Autonomous decision making Proactive issue resolution, real-time adaptability

Agentic workflows really shake things up for businesses. They team up autonomous AI agents with regular workflow automation. As a result, the adaptive systems that are built improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enable proactive, scalable operations.

This leads to true enterprise transformation by making businesses more agile, customer-centric, and future-ready.

Conclusion

Work isn’t getting simpler — it’s getting more dynamic, distributed, and data-driven.

Traditional workflows weren’t built for this level of complexity. They follow rigid paths, break under uncertainty, and rely heavily on human babysitting.

Agentic workflows are built differently. They reason, adapt, and improve like humans. Bottom line, agentic automation is a transformative shift in automation. It offers real potential to seriously boost how organizations operate, make decisions, and innovate.

Continue reading